Apple faces mounting lawsuits for deliberately slowing down iPhones
Thanks for contacting us. We've received your submission.
It’s going to be a long winter for Apple’s legal team.
The Silicon Valley titan is now facing at least eight US class-action suits after it admitted it intentionally slows down older iPhone models to prevent excessive wear and tear on their batteries.
Nevertheless, some Apple fanatics saw it as vindication of a long-running conspiracy theory that the Cupertino, Calif.-based company slows down older phones to coerce iPhone owners to buy new phones.
Now, Apple is staring down the barrel of lawsuits filed in US District Courts in California, New York and Illinois — including one for $999 billion.
The problem, as some of the lawsuits state, is that users over the last year could have blamed an aging computer processor for app crashes and sluggish performance — and chose to buy a new phone — when the true cause may have been a weak battery that could have been replaced for a fraction of the cost.
“Rather than curing the battery defect by providing a free battery replacement for all affected iPhones, Apple sought to mask the battery defect,” the nearly $1 trillion lawsuit alleges.
Whether Apple will find itself having to pony up, however, is a different story.
“It seems clear to me that somebody at Apple made a bad business decision by not being more transparent about the update and what was going on with the battery,” Rory Van Loo, a Boston University professor specialising in consumer technology law, told The Post. “It’s not yet clear, however, that they made a bad legal decision.”
Van Loo said that he thinks the most likely explanation for Apple’s lack of transparency is that Apple simply did not want its competitors to know what it was doing so that they would not copy it.
“One of Apple’s most valuable assets is its brand,” Van Loo said. “I have a hard time believing that somebody at Apple was so short-sighted as to say ‘okay, let’s slow down people’s old phones to get them to buy new ones.’”
Joshua J. Horowitz, a New York-based lawyer specializing in tech law, gave The Post a similarly skeptical opinion on the suits’ chances.
“Unless there are some emails going back and forth where this whole thing is being discussed as some sort of nefarious plot, I think it’s going to be very difficult to prove on the plaintiff’s side,” he said.
News Corp. is a network of leading companies in the world of diversified media, news, and information services.
December 29, 2017
Sources:` New York Post
Both Apple and Amazon are in talks to invest in Saudi Arabia, sources told Reuters, part of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s push to give the conservative kingdom a high-tech look. Both companies already sell products in Saudi Arabia via third parties but they and other global tech giants have yet to establish a direct...
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea said Friday that it was holding a Hong Kong-flagged ship and its crew members for allegedly violating U.N. sanctions by transferring oil to a North Korean vessel in October. The Lighthouse Winmore is believed to have transferred about 600 tons of refined petroleum products to the North Korean ship,...
Apple shares have been flying high — and CEO Tim Cook has been flying in style. The iPhone maker revealed that it has been requiring Cook to take a private jet for all travel, whether business or personal — a mandatory “perk” that cost the company $93,109 this year for pleasure trips alone. Meanwhile, the...
Asian stock markets mostly drifted higher on the final trading day of 2017 after Wall Street finished with modest gains
There is strong demand for commodities globally.
Asian indexes are mixed in quiet holiday after oil prices erase some of its recent gains and the region generally shrugs off the dip in technology stocks on Wall Street